<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mr. Infrastructure &#187; Growing the Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrinfrastructure.com/category/growing-the-business/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrinfrastructure.com</link>
	<description>Leveraging IT Infrastructure to realize your Private and Hybrid Cloud aspirations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Outsourcing &amp; margins</title>
		<link>http://mrinfrastructure.com/growing-the-business/outsourcing-margins</link>
		<comments>http://mrinfrastructure.com/growing-the-business/outsourcing-margins#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Growing the Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service catalog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrinfrastructure.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems about 50% of my clients these days have outsourced, are thinking about outsourcing or are insourcing.¬† Some of my customers are themselves outsourcers.¬† An interesting facet of the model these days is the introduction of new services to meet customer needs while providing opportunity for the outsourcer.¬† I&#8217;ve had the opportunity to meet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It seems about 50% of my clients these days have outsourced, are thinking about outsourcing or are insourcing.¬† Some of my customers are themselves outsourcers.¬† An interesting facet of the model these days is the introduction of new services to meet customer needs while providing opportunity for the outsourcer.¬† I&#8217;ve had the opportunity to meet with several outsourcers over the past few years and advise them on their service catalog, usually for storage.¬† A common complaint has been that &#8220;<em>we&#8217;re losing money on this deal</em>&#8221; which always manages to surprise me.¬† If you&#8217;re losing money on so many deals you may want to get out of the business, but I digress.¬† Usually it&#8217;s not just the outsourcer that is unhappy, the customers generally are too: they think the prices are too high, the service is lousy, and that they aren&#8217;t really getting what they need.¬† You can rarely go back to the table and renegotiate your price for Tier 1 service and raise the price, so how do you create a win-win situation?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to present one solution that has been used to good effect in the past: the introduction of a new, and necessary, tier of storage to the service catalog.¬† I think this applies not just to outsourcers but anyone who runs their environment in a service provider mode.¬† A lot of customer I interact with complain that the performance of their Tier 1 storage is suboptimal and that their backups never finish on time, or aren&#8217;t validated, etc.¬† While hardly a novel or new solution appropriate archiving is the answer to these sorts of problems, and if you view it from a TCO perspective you can gather a lot of financial evidence for the executives on why it should be implemented.</p>
<p>I encourage my customers to think of their production data in terms of two classes, this is the highest level of data classification in my opinion, Operational Data and Reference Data.¬† Operational Data is that which the enterprise uses on a regular basis to run the business, the key is understanding where the cut-off is for &#8220;regular basis&#8221;.¬† Reference Data is that which is helpful to have around,¬† you might use once in awhile, for a quarter close or year end analysis, but which is ignored on a daily basis.¬† Reference Data takes up valuable Tier 1 storage, backup bandwidth and storage, and as a result can lead to blown SLAs.¬† The appropriate archiving of this data provides an opportunity to right-size the environment, delay the purchase of additional Tier 1 arrays, streamline the backup flow and improve Service Levels by administering data according to its value to the business.¬† The creation of an Archive Tier(s) provides an opportunity to deliver a necessary service to the customer while also enabling the provider to structure it at an improved margin.¬† Customers will want to archive Reference Data when they can link it to improved Tier 1 and backup performance, driving archive utilization and with it the improved margin while at the same time improving the margin on the other services due to fewer SLA misses and a lower administration cost.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fmrinfrastructure.com%2Fgrowing-the-business%2Foutsourcing-margins&amp;title=Outsourcing%20%26%23038%3B%20margins" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://mrinfrastructure.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrinfrastructure.com/growing-the-business/outsourcing-margins/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

